Skip to main content

Is being a Stay-at-home-mum a luxury?

This question was posed on a parenting forum recently and I found myself in turmoil trying to answer this question for myself.

I've always thought it wasn't.

It's certainly nothing like spending a day in a spa, or going on a holiday to Tahiti (I'm guessing about that last point as I've never been on a holiday to Tahiti or anywhere like that). In my experience it can be a hard slog on bad days and certainly tiring on good days. It's also very, very rewarding (in hindsight, mostly, I've found). Having been a SAHM (whether the S stood for "stay" or "studying") for the past 10.5 years, I can say I preferred that role to the alternative - you know, having to go out to work or study and leaving my babies with someone else, however loving (even my lovely Dave).

But now I'm seeing a different perspective on the concept of "luxury". Luxury doesn't always mean opulence, and with regard to being a stay at home parent, I'd kind of forgotten that teeny-tiny differentiation. Sometimes the concept of "luxury" actually refers to "choice".

Ok, so some of you are going to say that there is always a choice, that most families live well and truly beyond their means and if they just exercised a little discretion then there would always be the "choice" of having one parent stay at home - even if it meant living on reconstituted lima beans.

Hmmmm, I guess I'd beg to differ, and I beg to differ having come from the perspective that you can choose to live quite frugally so that one parent can stay at home.

Maybe this is the issue, it's not so much about ONE parent staying home as WHICH parent gets to stay at home. At least, this is the new perspective I'm facing.

I'm currently doing a Certificate III in Children's Services. That is, I've signed up, paid the first part of the payments and shown up to most classes in the past three weeks. I would love to work in Children's Service, so that's not an issue. Still something is causing me unease. That something is the tiny little voice in my head that keeps reminding me that I'm missing time with Ari at the tender age of 16 months.

I've been going through the motions of doing this course, all the time hoping Dave would hurry up and get a job so I could postpone my studies until Ari is at four year old kinder. Or even, just do the course mostly at night and do blocks of placement to get it over and done with. It's not happening though. Dave is no closer to getting a job now than he was three weeks ago (I know, it's only been three weeks, but that seems such a long time!).

The reality is, we're now paying $450 a month more rent. *I'm* paying $450 a month more rent, and what's more, because I thought I'd get a payment from the government to do this course, I took some advances on my payments, so I'm paying $450 a month more, on $300 a month LESS than what I was getting in December. So, we're now $750 a month less well financed than we were before I signed up for the course. We've always lived on quite a small income. We don't run a car, or go on holidays, or have magasine subscriptions...

I NEED to get work if Dave isn't getting work. I NEED to face the fact that I can't afford the luxury of being a SAHM. We need to be able to breathe a little easier.

So, these days my answer to the question, "Is being a SAHM a luxury?", I'd have to answer for me, it is.


Stitch Sista said…
I feel very blessed to be able to stay at home. We planned it that way, and for us it's still a choice. If the worst came to it and DH lost his job, we could sell our house (the bank would get most of it of course) and live more frugally. But I understand it's not a choice for everyone...

Hope your DH finds something very soon!
katef said…
I totally think it is a 'luxury' and the choice is not just a financial one either...

It's not easy, it's not glamorous, or even fun a lot of the time. It's not at all a financial luxury for us, I feel like we 'do without' and 'make ends meet' a lot more than if I even worked part time, but it's what I want to do and I feel lucky to be doing it (mostly) which is why it feels like a luxury to me.

Popular posts from this blog

12 Things Happy People Do Differently - a self-reflection...

A few days ago a Facebook friend posted the above poster on her wall. I believe she got these points from this blog which she enjoys reading, and the bloggers on the Marc and Angel Hack Life blog derived their discussion of these points from this book, available on Amazon - you're welcome! I have to admit, I haven't read the blog or the book I've just mentioned but wanted my readers to have access to the sources of the poster for their own reflective purposes.
The New Year will be upon us in but a few days and I thought this a great opportunity to do a little personal assessment on how I'm playing the happy game. I'm often not very happy at all - I don't need to be happy all the time, let me just say that up front - I personally believe that life is a balancing act and those who seek euphoria often will also often feel desolation because in all things there must be balance. The great riches of the few on this planet come at the personal cost of the many as is …

The symbolism of elephants...

Just recently I've been seeing and noticing elephants everywhere!

A few weeks ago I saw the Samsung Elephant Ad, and watching that led me to watching a video with an elephant painting (seriously, you have to watch it to believe it!).

Then last night the boys told me they were having a free dress day at school to raise money for 'Mali the Elephant' - who turned out to be a paper maché statue which the children will paint and then show around the council before it comes back to the school to stand outside the performing arts room.

Then this morning I followed a link from Twitter to Toushka Lee's blog and read this post about an elephant orphanage in Sri Lanka.

This morning the Grumpy Old Man did another driving test and unfortunately didn't pass. We've booked his next test and are looking forward to that now. About ten minutes before he walked in the door I saw this poster on Facebook...

At the time, I didn't know if the Grumpy Old Man had been successful or …

Do you have low self-esteem?

I don't.

I used to think I did, but having met several people who really do have low self-esteem, I've now come to realise I actually have low confidence (and note I don't say low self-confidence, but more on that later), and that is a different breed of animal all together.

I was having a chat with a friend the other day about people who constantly put themselves down. If you are a participant in social media you might be aware of this kind of person. Everyone is smarter than them, prettier than them, more motivated, better organised, or has greater talent than them. It goes further, some of these people are not at all opposed to running themselves down to others with comments like, 'I'm so fat' (and not in a proud, fat acceptance way, but in a negative, self-loathing kind of way), or 'I'm stupid' or 'I'm ugly'.

Some people are just fishing for compliments, of course, but the ones who persist; the ones who simply cannot take a complimen…