Skip to main content

Let's talk about iPads in schools...


People who are friends with me on Facebook will know that one of the things preoccupying my thoughts at the moment is the introduction of a 1:1 iPad ratio at my childrens' primary school. We have had classroom iPads for a year or so now, and we also have laptops and desk tops in the classroom, so introducing 1:1 iPads is probably the next logical step in the IT progress of our school - and many schools in Melbourne.

The difference this time is that parents are expected to pay for these devices themselves.

We have a choice of hiring the iPads at $80 a term - or $320 per calendar year, or we can purchase an iPad of our child outright (a 16GB Wifi iPad retails for $449 at the app store, though I have seen sales of them around the $399 mark).

We can also do neither and then our children will share a classroom iPad with any other children who also do not have their own iPad.

It has been suggested that siblings can share one iPad - we have not had it explained how this would work with siblings who are in different areas of the school - perhaps a roster of days?

Putting aside the concern about increased exposure to screen time (we've been told they will only use the iPad, on average 20% of the time, or about an hour a day all up), I have several concerns about this new move.

On the 13th of November our politicians will vote on whether or not to scrap the school kids bonus. It seems likely at this point that the bonus will be scrapped. For my family, this means we will lose the potential of $2460 in assistance for the purchase (and hire) of educational costs.

At the same time we will be expected to pay a minimum of $2690 for the cost of 2 x iPad hire + 2 x laptop hire + 2 x $285 curriculum and services fees in primary school + 2 x $350 school fees in high school + 1 bare minimum high school uniform.

This does not include replacement uniform bits for three other children, incursions, excursions, free dress days ($2 donation per child each time), home insurance to cover iPads at home (compulsory), internet connections, Year 7 camp (which is highly recommended)...

Free public education is not free.

Even moving away from the money concerns... When asked if the teachers could teach without iPads and the students could learn without iPads, the school's response was twofold:

1) Yes, they can, but both teachers and students are more engaged in the presence of technology...

HELLO? Is that supposed to be reassuring? Are you telling me our teachers are not fully engaged in teaching? I'll tell you that that may be the reason the children are not fully engaged. Do Chinese kids all have iPads in China? Do Indian kids or African kids use iPads? I guess that is why they don't have any doctors or lawyers or teachers or business people in China, India, and Africa? Yes, I'm being facetious. The school is pretty much saying the iPads will save Australia's lagging literacy and numeracy rates, yes?

Well, no - a parent at the school asked if we will see a dramatic improvement in our children's learning outcomes and the staff got all flustered and said, 'Oh, it's not black and white like that!'

2) And the school asked us, 'Would we expect our doctors or dentists to work with old technologies?'

Um, no, but then again, my doctor doesn't expect me to buy the technologies she uses. I don't have to buy her computer or her blood pressure machine for her. Sure she may pass on those costs to me in appointment fees, but guess what, I don't pay out of pocket for those fees either - Medicare covers that because I'm on a ridiculously low income. I am medically not discriminated against because I don't earn over 100K.

I have yet to see how each child having their own iPad will improve their education and allow them to do things they could not have done with pencil and paper or their imaginations (someone think of the imaginations of these children!).

This is a lot of EXPENSIVE smoke and mirrors!

I tell you a tool that should be used and taught the use of in schools.



Rhianna SG said…
I agree that in primary schools parents should not be expected, or even asked to purchase iPads. Sure they have their benefits but they are not the be all and end all of learning and there should not be so much pressure to use them

Popular posts from this blog

12 Things Happy People Do Differently - a self-reflection...

A few days ago a Facebook friend posted the above poster on her wall. I believe she got these points from this blog which she enjoys reading, and the bloggers on the Marc and Angel Hack Life blog derived their discussion of these points from this book, available on Amazon - you're welcome! I have to admit, I haven't read the blog or the book I've just mentioned but wanted my readers to have access to the sources of the poster for their own reflective purposes.
The New Year will be upon us in but a few days and I thought this a great opportunity to do a little personal assessment on how I'm playing the happy game. I'm often not very happy at all - I don't need to be happy all the time, let me just say that up front - I personally believe that life is a balancing act and those who seek euphoria often will also often feel desolation because in all things there must be balance. The great riches of the few on this planet come at the personal cost of the many as is …

The symbolism of elephants...

Just recently I've been seeing and noticing elephants everywhere!

A few weeks ago I saw the Samsung Elephant Ad, and watching that led me to watching a video with an elephant painting (seriously, you have to watch it to believe it!).

Then last night the boys told me they were having a free dress day at school to raise money for 'Mali the Elephant' - who turned out to be a paper maché statue which the children will paint and then show around the council before it comes back to the school to stand outside the performing arts room.

Then this morning I followed a link from Twitter to Toushka Lee's blog and read this post about an elephant orphanage in Sri Lanka.

This morning the Grumpy Old Man did another driving test and unfortunately didn't pass. We've booked his next test and are looking forward to that now. About ten minutes before he walked in the door I saw this poster on Facebook...

At the time, I didn't know if the Grumpy Old Man had been successful or …

Do you have low self-esteem?

I don't.

I used to think I did, but having met several people who really do have low self-esteem, I've now come to realise I actually have low confidence (and note I don't say low self-confidence, but more on that later), and that is a different breed of animal all together.

I was having a chat with a friend the other day about people who constantly put themselves down. If you are a participant in social media you might be aware of this kind of person. Everyone is smarter than them, prettier than them, more motivated, better organised, or has greater talent than them. It goes further, some of these people are not at all opposed to running themselves down to others with comments like, 'I'm so fat' (and not in a proud, fat acceptance way, but in a negative, self-loathing kind of way), or 'I'm stupid' or 'I'm ugly'.

Some people are just fishing for compliments, of course, but the ones who persist; the ones who simply cannot take a complimen…